Intune MAM for Microsoft apps on iOS and iPadOS
How to create an App Protection Policy in Intune for Outlook, Teams and OneDrive on personal iPhones and iPads, without managing the device.
- Topic: Intune
- Platform: iOS/iPadOS
6 min readNew

In early November at least fourteen Dutch websites spread code through their ads that tried to take over iPhones. Anyone who had updated their device was, according to the publishers, expected to run no risk of a takeover: the exploited vulnerabilities had been fixed months earlier. Visit data could still go from every visitor to the attackers.
That is the lesson of this incident. As an organization you cannot stop a zero-day. A vulnerability whose patch is already available you can, and that is the minimum you have to arrange.
The attacker hacked none of the websites themselves, but the advertising system they share. Someone gained unauthorized access to its management system and added code to an ad tag. That system comes from an external supplier and is managed by a separate advertising service provider, according to the warning from VI.nl.
That tag runs on many sites at once, including VI, VoetbalPrimeur, Bright, Scientias, Autoblog, GeenStijl, Men’s Health and Runner’s World. Dutch public broadcaster NOS counts at least fourteen Dutch sites and one Belgian site. The publishers warned their visitors on Saturday evening, 14 November.
| Moment | What happened |
|---|---|
| 1 Nov, around 09:50 | Malicious code active in the ad tag |
| 1 Nov, around 14:44 | Code aimed at iPhones added |
| 3 Nov, 10:07 | First period ends |
| 3 Nov, 12:06 to 17:20 | Malicious code added again |
| 11 Nov, 15:34 to 15:50 | Another unauthorized change; its content is being investigated |
| 11 Nov | Vulnerability in the management system fixed |
The unauthorized accounts were removed and existing sessions ended.
The code did two things. It forwarded visit data, such as IP address, pages visited and device information. That could affect every visitor, also with an updated iPhone or another device. On top of that, it tried to exploit vulnerabilities in iOS to get to passwords, messages, photos, contacts and crypto wallets. The risk applied to a visit to the site, whatever the browser.
Whether devices were actually taken over has not been established yet. It is confirmed that visit data was sent to the attackers. The investigation is ongoing.
As far as investigated, only iPhones with an outdated iOS version were vulnerable to the takeover. The patches had existed for almost eight to almost eleven months when the attack began.
| Device | Vulnerable up to and including | Fixed in | Available since |
|---|---|---|---|
| iPhone XS, XR and later | iOS 18.7.2 | iOS 18.7.3 or iOS 26 | 12 December 2025 |
| iPhone 6s, 7, 8, X, SE (1st generation) | iOS 15.8.6 and 16.7.14 | iOS 15.8.7 and 16.7.15 | 11 March 2026 |
These are the versions the publishers and Security.NL name for this attack. For iOS 26 they give no minor version. Apple advises the latest iOS version.
For Android devices, iPads and computers the publishers found no comparable attack, but visit data from those devices may have been forwarded too. Apple already wrote in April 2026 in a warning of its own that devices with updated software were not vulnerable to the web attacks reported at that time.
Which exploit kit was used here has not been confirmed. Security.NL mentions Coruna and DarkSword.
More is known about DarkSword. Google described it in March 2026 as a chain of six vulnerabilities for iOS 18.4 up to and including 18.7, used since November 2025 by, among others, a vendor of surveillance software and a suspected Russian espionage group. For part of those vulnerabilities no patch existed yet at the time.
Then what happens more often, happened. Apple fixed the vulnerabilities, the kit leaked and criminals took it over. About three quarters of the detections are criminals who are after credentials and crypto, a report by iVerify shows.
An attack of yesterday, meant for a handful of targets, is today a tool that can run through an ad on a football site. What stands in between is mainly an update.
Roughly:
Whoever does not patch is vulnerable to every attacker with a download link. Whoever does patch is, for this kind of attack, left mainly with the attackers who can pay for a zero-day.

A user who taps “later” is not a patch policy. In a managed environment you enforce updates and check that they arrived.
The same holds outside iOS: Windows, macOS, browsers, firmware and third-party applications. The attacker picks the part you forgot.
Did you visit one of the sites between 1 and 3 November or on 11 November with an iPhone that was not updated? Then the publishers advise this:
Unable to update? For the web attacks reported earlier, Apple advised considering Lockdown Mode.
For organizations: